Obedience

Description

A-Levels Psychology (PSYB2 - Social Influence) Flashcards on Obedience, created by Adam O'Rourke on 25/05/2013.
Adam O'Rourke
Flashcards by Adam O'Rourke, updated more than 1 year ago
Adam O'Rourke
Created by Adam O'Rourke over 11 years ago
49
2

Resource summary

Question Answer
Feldman and Scheibe University students were asked to fill in a very personal and embarrassing questionnaire. Some in groups with people that complete the questionnaire and some with people that refuse and are asked to leave. The participants were much more likely do defy the order when others has as well (social support)
Evaluation Unrealistic experiments lack validity, (Bickman - Asking people to pick up litter in uniforms) Ethical Issues Participant Variables Demand Characteristics
Authoritarian Personality People with an authoritarian personality are commonly associated with obedience Adorno develop the f-scale (f for fascism) to measure how authoritarian a person is, he found that people with a strict up bringing were more authoritarian. Suggested that they displace their anger for their parents to people of lower status
Hyman and Sheatsley Authoritarian Personality is more associated with people with less education
The Perils of Obedience It help society function but allows people to justify doing horrible things to others
Milgrams Variations 1.Location - When it was done in a run down office in the city rather then Yale University obedience dropped 2.Personal Responsibility - When the participants could instruct someone else to press the switches, obedience went up to 95% 3.Legitimacy of Authority Figure - When authority figure seems morally right/ legally right, obedience is higher 4.Status of Authority Figure - When the experimenter wore normal clothes instead of the white lab coat, obedience dropped 5.Peer Support - If someone has social support or is in the presence of others that defy the order, conformity drops (Feldman and Scheibe) 6.Proximity of Authority Figure - When the experimenter gave the encouragement by phone, obedience dropped to 20.5%
Milgrams Experiment The machine used to administer the 'shocks' was labeled from slight shock to dangerous shock and the 450 volt switch was labeled XXX Several shocks the participant starts banging on the wall, then complaining of a heart condition, then asks to get out and eventually stops replying 63% gave the max voltage shock, all went up to 240 volts
Milgram Ethical Issues Harm to the participant Deception Informed Consent (They knew they were in an experiment but they thought it was about learning)
Show full summary Hide full summary

Similar

History of Psychology
mia.rigby
Biological Psychology - Stress
Gurdev Manchanda
Bowlby's Theory of Attachment
Jessica Phillips
Memory Key words
Sammy :P
Psychology subject map
Jake Pickup
Psychology A1
Ellie Hughes
Psychology | Unit 4 | Addiction - Explanations
showmestarlight
The Biological Approach to Psychology
Gabby Wood
Chapter 5: Short-term and Working Memory
krupa8711
Cognitive Psychology - Capacity and encoding
T W
Nervous Systems and the Brain - Lecture 1
Georgina Burchell