belief system- set of beliefs which help people
make sense of + interpret the world. are a
social construct which form a basis of
universes of meaning. they then feedback +
reinforce the society that constructed them,
applies to a whole spectrum of beliefs
Relgious ones are used to provide answers about phenomenons
e.g. life after death= give a sense of comfort. Scientific ones provide
hard facts about how things work e.g. Darwin's theory explain
evolution. these are all socially constructed + try to make sense of
the world. All form a part of + legitimate universes of meaning
Belief system are
often described as
either open / closed.
Science is usually seen as open. Popper= it is a system where theories are
open to scrutiny + testing by others. governed by falsification i.e. scientists
work to falsify existing theories by deliberating evidence to disprove them.
discarding falsified= scientific knowledge becomes cumulative, builds on
achievements of past scientists to develop greater understanding of the world
Further supported by
Merton= asserts science
works by CUDOS norms
However Kuhn argues they operate within communities and specific branches of
science. operate in shared paradigms (own ways of explaining how things work. Thus
they conduct experiments to defend rather than test theories. if forced they will modify
them not discard them. Case of Dr Velikovsky shows they reject theories which goes
against existing paradigms (like religion)
Marxists- manipulated to reinforce ruling class ideas,
advances are driven by capitalism e.g. theoretical work
on ballistics was driven by need for new weaponry
Feminists- perpetuates patriarchal
society, bio science tries to
reinforce male dominance.
PM- reject it as the 'truth', see it as a
metanarrative. falsely claims to have true
knowledge. also applies to other socio
theories, only versions of the truth
Religion is usually seen as closed, makes knowledge claims that cannot
successfully be overturned. when beliefs are questioned, 'get out clauses' are
used to prevent system from being disproved at least in eyes of believers.
Evans Pritchard found the Azande people would argue if the oracle was wrong
it was due to the method of the ritual being wrong + not the belief itself
PM- reject it as the 'truth',
see it as metanarratives.
ideology- a worldview/ set of ideas + values, a belief
system. has a range of meaning, usually negative. e.g.
idealised view of view, closed minded view/ ideas that
hide interest of a certain group/justify privileges
Marxists believe ruling classes use their control of mental
means of production (institutions) to assert ruling class
ideology over proletariat to legitimise inequalities + prevent
revolution. e.g. equality is against human nature. Despite
this marx believes they will develop class consciousness
Gramsci developed this- ruling class ideological
domination = hegemony. Proletariat can
develop ideas to challenge capitalism as
workers have dual class consciousness. To do
this, a political party of organic intellectuals
However Abercrombie et al- economic
factors e.g. fear of unemployment,
keep workers in line, not ideology
Mannheim- all belief systems are one-sided world views,
resulted from the viewpoint of a particular group/class +
their interests. there are 2 types of these. Perceives
these as creation of intellectuals who are associated
with a certain group = partial views of reality
ideological- justifies keeping things the same,
reflects position + interests of privileged groups
who benefit from maintaing status quo. belief
tends to be conservative + favour hierarchy
Utopian- justifies social change, reflects position +
interests of unprivileged groups. offers a vision of how
society can be organised differently. WC are
disadvantaged by status , may favour radical change,
marxism is an example of this.
must detach themselves from these groups
to create a 'free floating intelligentsia'. to
synthesise answers + create a total
worldview to represent all society.
critics argue this would be difficult as many
political ideologies are opposed to each other e.g.
marxist + conservatives, couldn't work together.
Feminists- gender inequality, result of
patriarchal ideology. gender difference
is present in different societies,
different ideologies are used to justify
it.
Marxs- science was used in C19th to justify
excluding women from education,
educating females would create 'a new
race of puny + unfeminine females'
would disqualify them from
true vocation i.e having
children+ being a housewife
Patriarchal ideologies can also be found in religious
beliefs + practices, define women as inferior. Many state
the idea of women being ritually impure + unclean due
to childbirth + menstruation- given rise to purification
rituals e.g. churching after birth.
In some Christian
churches, a new mother
won't receive communion
until she is schurched.
However not all elements of religion subordinate
women e.g. evidence of matriarchal religions in
Middle East before monotheistic patriarchal ones
e.g. Islam, Christianity + Judaism. Also in
hinduism goddesses are often portrayed as
mothers/creators of the universe
Religious
Organisations +
Movements
Weber- made distinction between
church + sect in early 20th C.
Troeltsch developed this- churches
are very different from sects
Church
(uniquely
legitimate)
universalistic but not in
practice- minorities may
be excluded
Worship is
restrained
ideologically
conservative
places few
demands on
members
has a bureaucratic
hierarchy of
professional clergy
Sect
(uniquely
legitimate)
draw members from
poor + oppressed
worship is
spontaneous
hostile to wider society
led by charismatic
leader
places high standards
on members
not individualistic
2 new types of
organisation were
then introduced
Denomination
(pluralistically
legitimate)
described as a watered
down church with
similarities to sects
broadly accepts society's
values but aren't linked to
state. Unlike sects they don't
reject wider society
disproportionately
middle class
reflects fundamental
view of individualism
Cult
(pluralistically
legitimate)
led by practitioners
who claim special
knowledge
highly
individualistic,
loose knit
lacks a fixed
doctrine
likely to be a
part-time
activity
term is interchangeable with
sects, refer to small religious
group whose beliefs deviate
from mainstream religions
AO2
problems with
classification (stark
+ bainbridge)
problems with
general application-
era dependent?
Problems with
stigma (Hadden)
NRMs
3 types
world
rejecting
similar to
sects
world
accommodating
similar to
denominations
world
affirming
similar to
cults
reasons for
growth of
sects + cults
Marginalisation
relative
deprivation
social
change
reasons for
growth of NRMS
world
affirming
(Bruce) response to
modernity,
rationalisation of work
world
rejecting
Failure of counter culture in the 60s
to change the world, disillusioned
youth turned to religion
dynamic of sects +
NRMS. often short
lived compared to
churches
denomination/
death
2nd generation
(Niebuhr)
protestant
ethic effect
death of
leader
sectarian
cycle
schism
initial
fevour
denominationalism
estabishment
further
schism
established
sects
conversionist e.g.
evangelicals
aim to convert a
large no. of people
Adventist e.g.
Mormons
must separate themselves
from corrupt world. less likely
to become a denomination
socialise children into high commitment.
Globalisation has allowed to attract
members from 3rd world countries rather
than made them become less separate
New Age
2 common
themes (Heelas)
Self
spirituality
have turned away from traditional external
religions e.g. churches, instead look inside to find
the spiritual
Detraditionalisation
rejects spiritual authority of external traditional sources e.g.
priests/ sacred texts. instead it values personal experience +
believes we can discover the truth within + for ourselves
beyond these New age
beliefs vary, could be world
affirming/ rejecting
heelas estimates
2,000 such activities +
146,000 practitioners
in UK
post
modernity
(Drane)
its appeal is part of a shift to postmodern
society. loss of faith in meta-narratives e.g.
science. Lost faith in experts + are turning to
NA idea that we can find the truth for
ourselves by looking within
modernity
(Bruce)
See NA eclecticism/ pick + mix spiritual
shopping as typical of late modern
religions, reflecting consumerist ethos
of capitalist society. Heelas also sees NA
+ modernity linked in 4 ways
source of
identity
consumer
culture
Rapid social
change
decline of
organised
religion
it is latest phase of
modern society not
post modernity
Modern society values individualism which is
a key principle of NA beliefs. Also an
important value for expressive professions
e.g. social worker/ artist which NA appeals to
NA beliefs are often softer versions of much more
demanding + self disciplined Eastern religions e.g.
Buddhism. They have been watered down to be
palatable to self centred Westerners- explains why NA
activities are often client cults, make few demands
Social Groups
+ Relgiousity
Age
Gender
Ethnicity
Religion +
Social Change
Conservative-
having traditional
views/ trying to
prevent change +
conserve things as
they are
functionalists- conservative
because it functions to maintain
stability + prevent society from
disintegrating e.g. promotes society
by creating consensus.
reducing likelihood for people to
pursue selfish interests. Also helps
them deal with stresses that would
disrupt society
Marxists + feminists= ideology which supports
existing structure + acts as a means of social
control. Creates stability in the interests of the
powerful, helps maintain stays quo + less
powerful from changing things
traditional marxist- it is conservative
ideology that prevents social change. By
legitimating/disguising exploitation +
inequality= creates false class consciousness
in WC + prevents revolution, maintains
stability of capitalism
Feminists- conservative force as it acts as an ideology
that legitimates patriarchal power + maintains women's
subordination in family + wider society
Radical
Weber sees it as a
force for change in
some circumstances
rejects Marx's view of religion
being shaped by economic factors.
although sometimes this may be
true at certain times + places
argues the beliefs of calvinism a form of
protestantism, helped bring about major
change- emergence of modern capitalism.
weren't the cause however.
capitalism developed in societies where religion was
influential. Past societies had capitalism (greed +
wealth). Modern capitalism is different (based on pursuit
of profit than consumption) = spirit of capitalism. Spirit
had an unconscious similarity to calvinism
material/economic factors were
needed e.g natural resources,
trade, a system of law etc.
calvinist had
several beliefs
predestination
divine
trancedence
asceticism
idea of a
vocation
ascetic
lifestyle had 2
consequences:
wealth + success gained performed a
psycho. function for them. took it as a
signor gods favour- why else would
they have prospered
driven by work ethic they
accumulated wealth in most rational
way possible. instead of squandering
it on luxuries they reinvested it in
businesses, which grew producing
more profit to reinvest etc.
this was spirit of capitalism-
object is simply the acquisition of
more money as an end in itself
Civil rights
movement
religion was an
ideological resource
taking moral
high ground
channeling
dissent
acting as
honest
broker
mobilised
public opinion
New Christian
right?- didn't
reflect society's
values
Marxism,
religion +
change
bloch- relgion has
dual character. while
it can inhibit change, it
can also inspire
protest + rebellion
liberation theology-
emerged in latin
america with
catholic church
McGuire- whether
religion can be a force
for change relies on:
beliefs of
particular
religion
culture of
the society it
exists in
social location
of religion
internal
organisation of
religious
institutions
religion +
class conflict
Biling applies gramsci's ideas in a case
study comparing class struggle in two
communities: coalminers (more
militant) + textile workers (more
accepting of status quo)