Non-Cooperation Movement 1920-22

Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-22)Nature Gandhi trying to encourage swadeshi through khadi (homespun clothing) tangible and accessible to the masses- everyone could get involved regardless of caste Hartal (mass protest) Swadeshi (Self-sufficiency) Ahimsa (Non-violence) Universal appeal to non-violence (ahimsa) which coincided with Hindu religious beliefs Refused to cooperate with British policies - hoped it would cause the British government to become non-functioning All titles and honours conferred by the British were given up and merchants and traders refused to trade in foreign goods ImpactOn Nationalism Mobilised the working and peasants classes (majority of society relied on the caste system) Reached the masses- they now understood nationalistic ideas and were then able to spread it Exposed the injustices of the British → people less content to exist under the discriminatory rule of the British Importation of cotton textiles declined significantly because of khadi Significance Had to end prematurely because of the Chauri Chaura event so not as significant as it could have been Introduced Gandhi’s satyagraha and ahimsa techniques to the nation Overall, campaign was successful as there was high participation, Hindus and Muslims collectively offered resistance The Rowlatt Act Hartel Nature Tangible and accessible to the masses- everyone could get involved regardless of caste Hartal (mass protest) Swadeshi (Self-sufficiency) Ahimsa (Non-violence) The Rowlatt Act was an extension of the Defence of India Act made during WW1: No civil rights, martial law, gatherings illegal, can be arrested without charge Gandhi claimed that the Rowlatt bills would deprive the people of their God-given right of freedom of expression – so for him was a religious cause Conducted a hartel whereby all shops and businesses would close for a day. People spent the day fasting and in prayer Worked best in Bombay on the 6th April 1919 Appealed to the mass as it was an accessible form of protests Impact British government are reluctant to arrest Gandhi as they feel he will become a matyr however on April 8 he is arrested The masses got behind the movement → showed individuals that they had the capacity to make a difference Significance Considered a failure since the Rowlatt Act remained unchanged However showed the Indian people that there was an alternative to the kind of politics that had been practiced As A Result of this… Amritsar Massacre 13th April 1919NatureIn Amritsar on 13th April 1919 a meeting to protest his arrest formed in an area called Jallianwala Bagh – Dyer, the British military commander, invoked the Rowlatt Act and ordered his troops to open fire on the groupImpact Destroyed any moral justification the Brits had of remaining in India Hunter Commission of Inquiry held on October 1919 (though report was released in 1920) was not seen by the Indian people to be sufficiently critical in its response to Dyer’s actions The public opinion in Britain was that of praise for Dyer, they believed that his actions were all a part of the liberation progress, that he was teaching the Indians the ways of civilisation SignificanceMany historians believe that the brutality of the shooting (at the amritsar massacre) was a turning point – the severe and humiliating British response destroyed any moral justification the Brits had of remaining in India, “a scar was drawn across Indo-British relations deeper than any which had been inflicted” (Percival Spear, The Oxford History of India)

Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-22)Nature Gandhi trying to encourage swadeshi through khadi (homespun clothing) tangible and accessible to the masses- everyone could get involved regardless of caste Hartal (mass protest) Swadeshi (Self-sufficiency) Ahimsa (Non-violence) Universal appeal to non-violence (ahimsa) which coincided with Hindu religious beliefs Refused to cooperate with British policies - hoped it would cause the British government to become non-functioning All titles and honours conferred by the British were given up and merchants and traders refused to trade in foreign goods ImpactOn Nationalism Mobilised the working and peasants classes (majority of society relied on the caste system) Reached the masses- they now understood nationalistic ideas and were then able to spread it Exposed the injustices of the British → people less content to exist under the discriminatory rule of the British Importation of cotton textiles declined significantly because of khadi Significance Had to end prematurely because of the Chauri Chaura event so not as significant as it could have been Introduced Gandhi’s satyagraha and ahimsa techniques to the nation Overall, campaign was successful as there was high participation, Hindus and Muslims collectively offered resistance The Rowlatt Act Hartel Nature Tangible and accessible to the masses- everyone could get involved regardless of caste Hartal (mass protest) Swadeshi (Self-sufficiency) Ahimsa (Non-violence) The Rowlatt Act was an extension of the Defence of India Act made during WW1: No civil rights, martial law, gatherings illegal, can be arrested without charge Gandhi claimed that the Rowlatt bills would deprive the people of their God-given right of freedom of expression – so for him was a religious cause Conducted a hartel whereby all shops and businesses would close for a day. People spent the day fasting and in prayer Worked best in Bombay on the 6th April 1919 Appealed to the mass as it was an accessible form of protests Impact British government are reluctant to arrest Gandhi as they feel he will become a matyr however on April 8 he is arrested The masses got behind the movement → showed individuals that they had the capacity to make a difference Significance Considered a failure since the Rowlatt Act remained unchanged However showed the Indian people that there was an alternative to the kind of politics that had been practiced As A Result of this… Amritsar Massacre 13th April 1919NatureIn Amritsar on 13th April 1919 a meeting to protest his arrest formed in an area called Jallianwala Bagh – Dyer, the British military commander, invoked the Rowlatt Act and ordered his troops to open fire on the groupImpact Destroyed any moral justification the Brits had of remaining in India Hunter Commission of Inquiry held on October 1919 (though report was released in 1920) was not seen by the Indian people to be sufficiently critical in its response to Dyer’s actions The public opinion in Britain was that of praise for Dyer, they believed that his actions were all a part of the liberation progress, that he was teaching the Indians the ways of civilisation SignificanceMany historians believe that the brutality of the shooting (at the amritsar massacre) was a turning point – the severe and humiliating British response destroyed any moral justification the Brits had of remaining in India, “a scar was drawn across Indo-British relations deeper than any which had been inflicted” (Percival Spear, The Oxford History of India)