Evaluation: Biological Treatment for
Offenders (Diet)
High sugar diets and crime
Moore et al found that 69% of violent
offenders in a group reported eating
'confectionary' pretty much every day
during their childhood. This suggests
there may be a link between the two,
however it would be unwise to conclude
that sugar causes violent crime.
A high sugar diet create high glucose
levels which, in turn, trigger major
insulin secretions to soak these up. This
leads to hypoglycaemia (a shortage of
glucose) which is associated with
irritability, difficulty making judgement,
and in extreme cases violent outbursts.
Benton found that children
playing video games became
more aggressive as blood sugar
levels decreased, suggesting
blood sugar does impact
behaviour.
A weakness is that it is difficult to establish a cause-and-effect
relationship between diet and crime. Crime is a complex activity
that is unlikely to be solved by treating a single factor alone. Those
in society with the poorest diets are also more likely to live in
socially and economically deprived circumstances, which may be
other root causes of offending behaviour. Therefore, the positive
effects of an improved diet may be short lived if offenders are
returned to the same circumstances following their sentencing.
Vitamins, minerals and fatty acids
Brain functions depend on biochemical
processes, which depend on a steady
supply of the right sort of vitamins and
minerals. Unsaturated fatty acids, such as
omega 3, magnesium, zinc and iron, as well
as vitamins B, C and D are the ones that are
most commonly linked to criminal
behaviour.
The more junk food people consume the
less space there is in the diet for
healthier nutritional content. The lack of
such nutrients has been linked to
particular mental illnesses like
depression, as well as behavioural
problems like aggression.
Another weakness of improving diet as a treatment for
offenders is that most studies done on the subject are geared
towards aggression and anti-social behaviour only. Although
many criminal acts are to do with aggression and violence,
many aren't - for example, financial crimes are unlikely to be
helped by a change in diet. This means that the benefits of an
improved diet may not apply to particular types of offenders
who did not commit an aggressive or violent crime.
Diet changes as a treatment for crime
To improve the diet of offenders, a baseline
measure of diet is first established to find out
which minerals/vitamins the offender is lacking
and how this is best addressed. In most cases,
a multi-vitamin will be added to the offender's
diet, after which any effects on behaviour will
be monitored over a certain period.
A strength of improving the diet of offenders is that
research supports the idea that it is effective. Gesch et al
found that by supplementing offenders' diets with
vitamins, minerals and fatty acids is linked to a decrease
in incidents of anti-social behaviour, including aggression.
Schoenthaler conducted a similar experiment to this and
found a 48% reduction in formal disciplinary incidents
among offenders who replaced sugary drinks, cereals and
desserts with low-sugar alternatives. This suggests that
high sugar diets are associated with anti-social behaviour
which can be controlled if sugar consumption is reduced.
However, both of these studies were
conducted in an institutionalised setting
where behaviour is strictly enforced and
controlled so we cannot know whether the
effects of diet on anti-social behaviour
would generalise to real life
Gesch's study was extremely well-controlled and he used a double-blind
procedure which minimised the effect of demand characteristics among
the offenders, as well as experimenter effects amongst the staff
administering the dietary pills. The groups were also matched on key
variables which meant that the difference in outcome between the two
groups could not be explained by other participant factors. This means
his findings are valid.