Changing the way you learn

Quality Process: Programme Review

What needs to be done for a successful review?
1. Submission of documentation
  1. Statistical data
  2. Examiner reports
  3. Programme monitoring reports
  4. Formal and informal student feedback
  5. Financial reports
  6. Evidence of quality enhancement activity
2. Panel visit
  1. Who is involved?
    1. The programme team
    2. The Panel Chair
    3. The Panel Officer
    4. The academic staff lead
  2. What is done?
    1. Event Scope established
    2. identify logical and logistical arrangements
    3. identify the structure and agenda for the event
    4. Establish the readiness of documentation
What is the timeline for review
1. Start the review at least one calendar year in advance
2. Deadlines are guided by the partner instiution's directives
What are the departmental and institutional responsibilities involved in completing the process
1. Departmental
  1. Determine and evaluation of programme learning goals
  2. Review educational components of the programme
  3. Identify instructional components
  4. Student advisement and mentoring
  5. Identification of necessary Infrastructure
  6. Educational Environmental considerations
2. The institution
  1. Review of departmental needs
  2. Implementation of approved plans
  3. Documentation of process
  4. Discussion with and among internal and external entities
Formal outcomes
1. Re-Approval based on a revised partnership agreement
2. Non Approval
  1. Feedback is given
    1. A reasonable time allotment is given
      1. A re-review is conducted where a final decision is made
How international collaboration impacts the process
1. Facilitates the process through mutual participation
2. Creates opportunity for new developments
3. Documentation of changes for full comprehension
4. Consideration of future needs of the country and students
Who should be involved?
1. All stages
  1. Strategic Managers
  2. Teaching staff
  3. Students
2. When the nature of the programme is defined
  1. Employers
  2. Professional bodies
  3. Industry representatives
Management of external expectations/requirements
1. Periodic critical appraisals
2. Consideration of views from
  1. Student
  2. Staff
  3. Examiners
  4. Employers

Next up

Quality Process: Programme Review

Description

Resource summary

Media attachments

Similar

	Created by Y Valdez (oyohva almost 9 years ago