Duress Case Question

The case of [blank_start]HASAN[blank_end] lays out the elements of duress.

The case of [blank_start]WRIGHT[blank_end] states that D's partner qualifies as a person to whom threats can be made that D finds them self reasonably responsible for.

The case of [blank_start]BOWEN[blank_end] states that some of D's characteristics can be considered when deciding if they acted as a reasonable person in the circumstances.

The case of [blank_start]GILL[blank_end] states that where D has a reasonable opportunity to escape the threats or phone the police, the defence of duress is not available.

The case of [blank_start]HASAN[blank_end] states that the threat must still be effective at the time D commits the offence for duress to be available as a defence.