Theft Case Questions

Description

A2 Law (Offences Against Property ) Quiz on Theft Case Questions, created by Lucy Nove on 08/02/2017.
Lucy Nove
Quiz by Lucy Nove, updated more than 1 year ago
Lucy Nove
Created by Lucy Nove over 7 years ago
41
0

Resource summary

Question 1

Question
The case of [blank_start]MORRIS[blank_end] indicates that D can assume any of the rights of the owner, not all.
Answer
  • MORRIS

Question 2

Question
The case of [blank_start]GOMEZ[blank_end] says there can be an appropriation even where V has consented to D taking the property.
Answer
  • GOMEZ

Question 3

Question
The case of [blank_start]HINKS[blank_end] allows an appropriation where the property was a gift to D
Answer
  • HINKS

Question 4

Question
The case of [blank_start]KELLY AND LINDSAY[blank_end] states that body parts can be personal property if they have been treated for teaching purposes.
Answer
  • KELLY AND LINDSAY

Question 5

Question
The case of [blank_start]TURNER (No.2)[blank_end] states that a person can steal their own property.
Answer
  • TURNER (No.2)

Question 6

Question
The case of [blank_start]WOODMAN[blank_end] states that property can belong to another even if they did not know it was there.
Answer
  • WOODMAN

Question 7

Question
The case of [blank_start]DAVIDGE v BUNNETT[blank_end] states that where money is given to D for a specific purpose, when D spends that money one something else, the money belongs to V again and it is theft.
Answer
  • DAVIDGE v BUNNETT

Question 8

Question
The case of [blank_start]HALL[blank_end] states that where money is given to D but there is no legal obligation to spend it on a specific thing, it is not theft if D fails to spend it on what was expected.
Answer
  • HALL

Question 9

Question
The case of [blank_start]ATTORNEY GENERAL'S REFERENCE (NO.1 OF[blank_end] 1983) states that where property is received by mistake and there is a legal obligation to return it, it is theft if D does not.
Answer
  • ATTORNEY GENERAL'S REFERENCE (NO.1 OF

Question 10

Question
The case of [blank_start]SMALL[blank_end] states that D's belief in the negative definition of dishonesty must be genuine rather than reasonable.
Answer
  • SMALL

Question 11

Question
The case of [blank_start]GHOSH[blank_end] lays down the test for dishonesty in theft
Answer
  • GHOSH

Question 12

Question
The case of [blank_start]VELUMYL[blank_end] states that where D picks up property intending to steal it, then changes his mind and replaces it, he has the intention to permanently deprive.
Answer
  • VELUMYL

Question 13

Question
The case of [blank_start]LLOYD[blank_end] states that where D returns property without it's goodness, virtue and practical value, he had the intention to permanently deprive.
Answer
  • LLOYD

Question 14

Question
The case of [blank_start]DPP v LAVENDER[blank_end] states that where D took property intending to sell it back to V, he still had the intention to permanently deprive.
Answer
  • DPP v LAVENDER
Show full summary Hide full summary

Similar

Functionalist Theory of Crime
A M
Realist Theories
A M
Carbohydrates
Julia Romanów
Control, Punishment & Victims
A M
Ethnicity, Crime & Justice
A M
AQA A2 Biology Unit 4: Populations
Charlotte Lloyd
AQA Physics: A2 Unit 4
Michael Priest
Coloured Compounds (AQA A2 Chemistry)
Filip Lastovka
Gender, Crime & Justice
A M
A2 Law: Cases - Defence of Insanity
Jessica 'JessieB
Theories, Theorists and Tests
sarahsing