Created by Kat Torres
over 5 years ago
|
||
Question | Answer |
Judicial Review | Based off Marbury v. Madison, "emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is." They have to power to determine the constitutional validity of a legislative act. |
Supreme Court Authority over State Court Judgments | Based on Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, the United States Supreme Court has authority to exercise appellate review of state court decisions. |
The Marshall Trilogy Cases | 1. Cherokee Nation v. Georgia 2. Johnson v. McIntosh 3. Worchester v. Georgia |
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia | Indian Nations are Domestic Dependent Nations |
Johnson v. McIntosh | Based on the Discovery Doctrine, Tribes do not have the legal ability to transfer title of tribal lands. |
Worchester v. Georgia | Based on the Indian Commerce Clause, the laws & treaties of the U.S. contemplate Indian territories as completely separate from the States. Therefore, all intercourse with them in EXCLUSIVELY carried out by the Fed. gov't. |
Acronym for Marshall Trilogy Concepts (D. E. T) | D: Domestic, Dependent Nations E: Exclusivity with the Federal Gov't. T: Tribes can't transfer title. |
5 concepts arising from Case and Controversy Clause | 1. Standing 2. Mootness 3. Ripeness 4. Advisory Opinions 5. Political Question |
Standing elements | 1. Injury in fact 2. Causation 3. Redressability |
What is "injury in fact"? | 1.Requires a particularized & concrete injury 2. Actual and imminent |
What is "causation"? | There must be a fairly traceable causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of |
What is Redressability? | Must be likely, not speculative that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision |
What is Mootness? | The case must not arise too late (after the controversy has been resolved) |
What is ripeness? | The case must not arise too soon before the issues are well-defined |
What is a political question? | The issue must not be: 1. Constitutionally committed to the un-reviewable discretion of one of the political branches 2. nor one that prudentially should have been left to another branch. |
What is an advisory opinion? | Opinions by the Supreme Court on the legality of executive or legislative action that do not involve a case. There has to be a concrete case for the court to rule on something's constitutionality. |
Third Party Standing | The court has held that a plaintiff must assert his OWN legal rights and interests and not claim to relief on the interests of third parties. |
Non-Justiciable Political Questions (A.R.T.I.) | 1. A: The constitutional amendment process 2. R: Republican form of government 3. T: Treaty abrogation 4. I: Impeachment of federal judges |
Justiciable Political Questions (C.P.R.) | 1. Congressional Qualifications 2. Presidential Election Process 3. Recognition fo foreign sovereigns |
Key main sources of Congressional Power (4) | 1. Taxing clause 2. Spending clause 3. Commerce clause 4. Necessary & Proper clause |
Key sources of Executive Power (2) | 1. Vesting power 2. War power |
Key limiting principles on the Federal Government (2) | 1. 10th amendment (powers not vested in the federal government remain with the states) 2. 11th amendment (can't sue states in federal courts) |
Key limiting principles on State Governments | 1. Commerce Clause 2. Dormant Commerce Clause (the regulation of certain spheres are designated solely to the fed. gov't. UNLESS it delegates that power to the states) |
Gibbons v. Ogden established what? | There are separate spheres for the federal and state governments and overlapping areas. (taxing) |
What is the function of the Necessary and Proper Clause? | Used to effect the purposes of other enumerated powers: 1. Is the end within the scope of the Constitution? 2. Are the means appropriate? 3. Are the means prohibited by the Constitution? |
Famous case dealing with the N & P Clause | McCulloch v. Maryland (if the end be legitimate, all the means appropriate may be employed to carry into effect pursuant to the N&P clause) |
What are intergovernmental tax immunities? | A power to create implies a power to destroy. Where a repugnancy exists, the authority which is supreme must control. "You cannot tax your dad" |
Impact of McCulloch v. Maryland | 1. In areas where Congress has power, the states are subordinate. (Fed. gov't has supremacy over states) 2. Broad interpretation of the N&P clause 3. States cant take actions that would threaten the sovereignty of the U.S. |
U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton | States cannot create their own qualifications for members of congress |
NFIB v. Sibelius dealing with the 10th Amendment & Necessary / Proper Clause | The Commerce Clause allows Congress to regulate commerce; it does not allow it to force people to engage in commerce. N&P doesn't work here bc individual mandate not essential component to insurance reform. |
Hammer v. Dagenhart | (OVERRULED) Can't regulate child labor via the CC as pretext for exercising states' police power. |
United States v. Darby | Overruled Dagenhart, competition based on substandard labor conditions can be regulated. |
Want to create your own Flashcards for free with GoConqr? Learn more.